Who should decide when "extraordinary means" to preserve life should be discontinued? The individual, the family, or the government?
Date Submitted: 02/15/2002 03:52:07
Category: / Social Sciences / Controversial Issues
Length: 4 pages (1025 words)
Category: / Social Sciences / Controversial Issues
Length: 4 pages (1025 words)
Who should decide when "extraordinary means" to preserve life should be discontinued? The individual, the family, or the government? In my opinion, I would say that no one has the right to end another person life no matter what pain they undergo. Taking away a human's life is considered immoral, unethical, and unlawful, and it is considering a crime. In other word, I'm totally oppose the idea of euthanasia. Euthanasia is "Inducing the painless death …
Is this Essay helpful? Join now to read this particular paper
and access over 480,000 just like this GET BETTER GRADES
and access over 480,000 just like this GET BETTER GRADES
…controversial topic that raises many religious, medical and ethical issues. Viewpoints of opponents and advocates have been debated for many years. There are many pros and cons towards legalizing euthanasia: it would give people greater autonomy over their own lives and give terminally ill people a chance to avoid great pain and emotional distress. However, it begins the degradation of the prohibition of murder, and opens up the possibility of further erosion of the system.
Need a custom written paper? Let our professional writers save your time.