What’s wrong with television violence
Date Submitted: 08/10/2003 02:31:34
Clearly, something is wrong. Broadcasters are licensed to serve "the
public interest, convenience and necessity." They are paid to deliver
receptive audiences to their business sponsors. Few industries are as
public relations-conscious as television. What compels them to endure
public humiliation, risk the threat of repressive legislation and invite
charges of undermining health, security and the social order?
The usual rationalization that violence delivers the goods -- it "gives
the audience what it wants" --
Is this Essay helpful? Join now to read this particular paper
and access over 480,000 just like this GET BETTER GRADES
and access over 480,000 just like this GET BETTER GRADES
them, it distracts from focusing on the
major conditions producing violence in society and limits discussion of
television violence to its most simplistic dimension.
Violence is a complex scenario and social relationship. Whatever else it
does, violence in drama and news demonstrates power. It portrays
victims, as well as victimizers. It intimidates, as well as incites. It
shows one's place in the "pecking order" that runs society. And, it
"travels well" on the world market.
Need a custom written paper? Let our professional writers save your time.