Torte Law Gregory Langadinos, Plaintiff, Appellant, VS American Airlines, Inc. Defendant, Appellee.
Date Submitted: 07/17/2004 19:05:25
Facts of the case
<Tab/>An American Airline's employee served alcohol to Debord prior to the assault and knowing that he was intoxicated and his behavior was "erratic and aggressive". Gregory Langadinos appealed from the district court's order dismissing his amended complaint alleges that AA violated the Warsaw Convention by continuing to serve alcohol to an intoxicated passenger who then assaulted Langadinos. AA filed a motion to dismiss for failure to
Is this Essay helpful? Join now to read this particular paper
and access over 480,000 just like this GET BETTER GRADES
and access over 480,000 just like this GET BETTER GRADES
didn't prove that AA allowed "willful misconduct".
<Tab/>If Lagadinos would have argued the "willful misconduct" by AA, he would have had to prove that AA allowed willful misconduct and have a $75,000 damage limit applicable to accidents taking place during this period. He was entitled to seek damages above the cap by proving that the incident was caused by AA serving Debord too much alcohol and it resulted in willful misconduct.
Need a custom written paper? Let our professional writers save your time.