Does falsification provide an answer to the problems of induction?
Date Submitted: 11/01/2004 15:44:39
This essay aims to clarify and alliterate the differences in the arguments and theories of the alternating scientific procedures expressed by the empiricist philosophers Hume and Popper.
Additionally, I have added the thoughts of Kuhn, a historian of science and of Feyerabend, an extremist philosopher who both provide their own opinions to the nature of science.
Finally, I offer my own humble opinions and answer the above question after talking in depth about the topic
Is this Essay helpful? Join now to read this particular paper
and access over 480,000 just like this GET BETTER GRADES
and access over 480,000 just like this GET BETTER GRADES
his hypothesis superior to the original one he based it on.
It is therefore that Popper has not provided an answer to the problems Hume classifies; he has simply found an alternative way of thinking about the basis and build up of science that in my opinion has a more solid foundation, as it covers a wider range of scientific areas and does not have as many theoretical problems as with induction.
(c) 2004 Mark Fulton
Need a custom written paper? Let our professional writers save your time.