Distinguish any CGT issues on Grundnorm's case.
Date Submitted: 09/10/2006 02:30:11
Question on Capital Gains Tax Due Week 11:
Effect of death: s 128:
Death is generally not a CGT event (s 128). There is an exception under CGT event K3 s 104-215 that covers leaving assets to exempt entities as defined in s 995-1. In this case, Grundnorm's uncle died and left him a property consisting of a house and 10 hectares of land and some collectables and a yacht. There was no evidence to show that Grundnorm was
Is this Essay helpful? Join now to read this particular paper
and access over 480,000 just like this GET BETTER GRADES
and access over 480,000 just like this GET BETTER GRADES
Sales proceed of the property(including the compensation) $2,050,000
Cost base
Acquisition cost--House: $200,000
---Land: $600,000
Incidental cost---solicitor fee: $20,000
Capital enhancement cost---Demolish: $40,000
---Build Units: $400,000
Total cost base $1,260,000
Capital gain $790,000
Watch:
Sales proceed $2,000
Reduced cost base $15,000
Capital loss $13,000 (can be used only to reduce capital gains from earrings: s 108-10, thus, the net capital loss was $12,500).
Earrings:
Market value $1,500
Cost base $1,000
Capital gain $500
Yacht:
Market value $40,000
Reduce cost base $50,000
Capital loss $10,000 (can be disregarded: s108-20)
Net Capital gain= 790,000*50%= $395,000
Need a custom written paper? Let our professional writers save your time.