Compare and contrast the concepts of eudaimonia and happiness, and their respective roles in the ethical philosophies of Aristotle and Mill
Date Submitted: 05/18/2003 08:07:42
In the Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle attempts to determine what the best life consists in, and demonstrate that all human action aims at eudaimonia. Mill's ethical philosophy is that actions are right if they promote the general amount of happiness, wrong if they decrease it. Their respective concepts, eudaimonia and happiness are similar in many ways, for example, they both embrace the idea of quality of happiness as well as quantity. There is a fundamental difference
Is this Essay helpful? Join now to read this particular paper
and access over 480,000 just like this GET BETTER GRADES
and access over 480,000 just like this GET BETTER GRADES
R. Norman, 1998. The Moral Philosophers. Oxford University Press
J. Urmson, 1988. Aristotle's Ethics. Blackwell
D. Bostock, 2000. Aristotle's Ethics. Oxford University Press
J. Ackrill, 1980. 'Aristotle on Eudaimonia', in Rorty (ed.) Essays on Aristotle's Ethics
D. Uyl and Machen, 1983. 'Recent Works on the Concept of Happiness', American
Philosophical Quarterly
D. Ross, 1923. Aristotle. Routledge
W. Hardie, 1982. The Final Good in Aristotle's Ethics.
C. Woodard, 2003. Module handbook for V71MOR: Moral Philosophy
www.csudh.edu.phenom_studies/ethics/lect_3.htm
Need a custom written paper? Let our professional writers save your time.