Compare and contrast the assumptions, if any, which classical elitists, pluralists and rational choice theorists bring to the analysis and explanation of politics.
Date Submitted: 03/31/2003 22:48:15
Category: / Social Sciences / Politics
Length: 8 pages (2119 words)
Category: / Social Sciences / Politics
Length: 8 pages (2119 words)
Abstract
With regard to the study of politics, this essay will attempt to define elitism, citing the major founders of the discipline. Pluralism and rational choice theory will also be discussed in turn, with particular attention to the main assumptions involved in the application of the theories. All three disciplines will be criticised and compared on any assumptions that seem to differ or oppose each other. A conclusion will be made, summing up the merits …
Is this Essay helpful? Join now to read this particular paper
and access over 480,000 just like this GET BETTER GRADES
and access over 480,000 just like this GET BETTER GRADES
…and usefulness for political science' from The Economic Approach to Politics (New York, Harper-Collins).
Mosca, G. (1896/1965) 'The Ruling Class' from The Ruling Class (New York).
Pareto, V. (1915/1919: 1966) 'Residues and elites' from Sociological Writings (London).
Smith, M. J. (1990) 'Pluralism, Reformed Pluralism and Neo Pluralism: the role of pressure groups on policy-making' from Political Studies, volume 38 pp. 302-322.
Lecture Notes, The University of York Department of Politics, Module no. 2110002 (Politics B, The World of Politics) Autumn Term 2003.
Need a custom written paper? Let our professional writers save your time.