Argument against Kenneth Pollack's position in "The Threatening Storm" for war in Iraq
Date Submitted: 05/27/2003 01:35:41
Category: / Social Sciences / Current Issues
Length: 7 pages (1803 words)
Category: / Social Sciences / Current Issues
Length: 7 pages (1803 words)
Although Kenneth Pollack makes a strong argument for war with Iraq in The Threatening Storm, his position is entirely incorrect. The evidence against war is plentiful and very well expressed by many scholars, such as Richard Betts, Mark Strauss, Stephen Walt and John Mearsheimer. There are many major factors to keep in mind regarding the situation in Iraq. For instance, the United States must remember that international support is not only preferable, but necessary. Furthermore, …
Is this Essay helpful? Join now to read this particular paper
and access over 480,000 just like this GET BETTER GRADES
and access over 480,000 just like this GET BETTER GRADES
…'morning after' regime change: Picking up the pieces." Christian Science Monitor, January 15, 2003.
Kuttner, Robert. "The unconvincing case for war." The American Prospect, December 16, 2002, p.2.
Mearsheimer, John J. and Stephen M. Walt. "An unnecessary war." Foreign Policy, January-February 2003, p. 50.
Scowcroft, Brent. "Don't Attack Saddam." Wall Street Journal, August 15, 2002. p.A12.
Starr, Paul, Robert Kuttner, and Harold Meyerson. "A Reckless Rush to War." The American Prospect, September 9, 2002.
Strauss, Mark. "Attacking Iraq (Think Again)." Foreign Policy, March 2002 p. 14.
Need a custom written paper? Let our professional writers save your time.