Abortion: Ms. Warren and Mr. Marquis
Date Submitted: 09/10/2006 00:27:13
The authors differ in that Ms. Warren presented a legal argument and Mr. Marquis
presented a moral argument. This is not to say that Ms. Warren didn't probe the moral
implications of the subject but only as to clarify for whom our morals serve.
Ms. Warren argued that an important step in finding a solution to the moral debate of
abortion would be to define what we consider a "human person". She believes that "the
Is this Essay helpful? Join now to read this particular paper
and access over 480,000 just like this GET BETTER GRADES
and access over 480,000 just like this GET BETTER GRADES
am more critical of his argument but I think it is because I think he avoids, by
the use of "potential" life, the main argument of when life is begins; at conception or at
birth. Because of this I am not swayed by his emotional argument. I agree much more
in the concept Ms. Warren argues that defining the differences between the actual person
and the potential person is necessary to accurately argue either position.
Need a custom written paper? Let our professional writers save your time.